Showing posts with label The Saoirse Chronicles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Saoirse Chronicles. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

The Way Back

I found out about The Way Back during my research into Saoirse Ronan's acting history for the paper I had to write for an acting class (I think I've mentioned that in at least one previous blog post).

At the time I was writing the paper, I will admit I hadn't actually seen any movies with Saoirse.  So, in desperation, I searched the internet for any movies she was in (other than The Host which hadn't yet been released at the time) that I might be able to obtain and watch prior to turning in the paper.  My investigation led me to City of Ember (2008).  Blockbuster happened to have a copy, and they were willing to hold it until I got out of class (3 hours later), and thus I was able to watch a Saoirse Ronan movie before turning in my paper (not due until the following Friday).

But, there was a list of other movies as well.  The Lovely Bones, Atonement, and Hanna to name a few.  One of those movies was The Way Back.  And, since that movie was on the list of Saoirse-movies, I watched the trailer.  

It's important to note that I've been interested in World War Two and Holocaust history ever since I was eight years old.  I love learning about Anne Frank and Corrie Ten Boom.  I love reading about their "adventures" hiding from and evading the Nazis.  In fact, I used to play that I was hiding from Nazis when I was younger.  Sick, twisted game, I know, but I didn't fully comprehend the horrors of the holocaust, and how terrifying really hiding from the Nazis would have been.

I also love the WW2 POW stories, like The Great Escape (which I, and others I know, think should be retitled The Great Escape Attempt That Ended Badly for 50 People) and the Van Ryan Express.  I love reading/hearing about their brave and elaborate escape attempts, and their daring journeys across enemy lands, hoping to make it to safety before they are recaptured.

That's why The Way Back stuck out to me so much.  More or less based on a true story, it chronicles the journey of several escapees from a Soviet Gulag as they tracked across about 4000 miles of Siberian craziness and merciless desert to reach India and freedom from Communism.

"This movie is dedicated to them," the opening title on the movie states.

Movies like these, I think, are testimonies to human ingenuity and determination.  God did not create mankind to be a bunch of quitters.  Instead, God gave us survival instincts, and the will to pull through, to conquer obstacles, and to keep going until we reach our destination.  Movies like these inspire me.

I just recently got around to watching The Way Back on Netflix.  With subtitles.  The movie is set in Soviet Russia, and therefore everyone (except Mr. Smith) speaks with very thick Russian/Polish/German accents, which - though lovely and authentic — are very difficult to understand at times.  Even more impressive is that everyone not only had to pull out the Russian accents for the film, but they also had to learn fluent Russian.  Colin Farrell and Saoirse Ronan are Irish, and Jim Sturgess is from England, yet they pulled off spotless Russian accents, as well as speaking (and singing) in fluent Russian.  Even flat-out American Ed Harris speaks fluent Russian.  As said before, I'm impressed.

Within the first 9 minutes of the movie, I was already finding some interesting things.

For one, the Soviet Union and the United States (defying all logic, and only becoming friends because of a mutual dislike for Hitler) joined forces during the 2nd World War.  Yet, Mr. Smith (Ed Harris) is an American prisoner.  Another prisoner in the Gulag tells the mean character, Janusz (not played by Saoirse Ronan, mind you) that, "Stalin hates foreigners," in reference to Mr. Smith's being an American. 

I found this interesting.  Even though Stalin and Roosevelt joined forces during WW2, Stalin was still the sick, twisty freak he'd always been, and possibly even imprisoned Americans.  Really, this shouldn't be surprising when you think about it.  But, I found it slightly ironic.  Maybe, this can be explained by the fact that The Way Back takes place in 1941, and the US didn't officially join the War (and thus enter a partnership with Stalin) until 1942?

Also interesting is Irena's story in terms of historical accuracy.  I haven't done a whole lot of research on the Soviet Union.  But, I have read Goodbye is Not Forever by Amy George (I highly recommend reading this book!).  Amy (an Americanized version of her Russian nickname "Emmi") grew up in Russia under Stalin, and was taken (along with her mother, brother, and sister) to Nazi Germany after the Germans invaded the Soviet Union.  When the War was over, all of the Soviets who had been taken to Germany were told that Soviet Russia would allow them to come home.  They find out, though, that the Soviet Union really considers them all traitors for leaving Russia (even though they didn't have a choice), and they were be imprisoned upon return.  So, did Emmi and her family escape?  Well, you'll just have to go read the book to find out.  

Returning to Irena's story.

Irena (who is played by Saoirse Ronan) says her parents were Polish Communists.  I assume they lived in Warsaw, but I don't remember this ever actually being confirmed.  Regardless, they moved their family to Moscow to be around fellow Communists (just like one big, happy family of Comrades from all over the world!).  But, Mother Russia had other, more devious plans.  The Soviets accused them of being spies from Nazi Germany, and had them arrested.  Irena and her brother were taken to an orphanage (images from the movie Hugo flash through my mind at this point).  Needless to say, she escaped.  Eventually.  Yup.  That's the Communist Soviet Union for you.

Also consistent with history is when Mr. Smith calls Irena's bluff (she has a back-up story).  She claims to have lived on a farm near Warsaw when the Soviets came.  Tragedy strikes, she's captured by Russians, so on and so forth.  But, as Mr. Smith points out, Warsaw was never under Soviet control.  Warsaw was taken by Germany when Hitler invaded.  I looked this up to confirm it after watching the movie.  

Busted!

Regardless of why she went there, she happens to be in Siberia and run into the six remaining escapees, Janusz, Mr. Smith, Valka (Colin Farrell), Voss, Zoran, and Tomasz.  Together, they break snow, ice, mesquites, deserts, dust storms, and all kinds of other things.  Of the seven fugitives, only three actually make it to their destination (India).

Other examples of how messed up the Soviet Union was.

Janusz (Jim Sturgess) is unjustly accused of spying.  To his credit, he doesn't sign the confession.  Not to his credit, his wife gets tortured in his place.  This isn't his fault, though.  That's just how messed up The Soviet Union is.  Later on, though, we discover that pretty much the same thing happened to Mr. Smith; the false accusation and the torture of a close family member.  So, it turns out, the two of them have some sort of connection, and are able to talk about it a little.  A little, mind you.

One other prisoner remarks that he was arrested for playing an aristocrat in a movie.  The Soviets accused him of glorifying the former something or other.  That whole thing gets him 10 years in Siberia.

Even crazier is Valka.  The guy's a prisoner in a Soviet gulag, but he's got a picture of Stalin and Lenin tattooed on his chest.  He tells his fellow escapees, "Don't you know what 'Stalin' means, funny man? Means man-of-steel. He takes from rich, and gives to poor."  Crazy.

I love Zoran's response, though: "Yes, of course he does.  Then he takes both of them, and puts them in a Gulag for 25 years."  Sad, but true.

Epic Quote: [as they cross the border from Russian into Mongolia] "Thank you, Mother Russia, for your hospitality.  But I will definitely not be coming back."

That made me laugh.  Pretty hard.  So hard that I rewind the movie and watched it again.  And then, turned on the computer and wrote it down for this blog post.   

The film is a display of no-nonsense filmmaking.  It jumps from one clip to another between the important scenes or conversations — brief clip of cooking, brief clip of eating, brief clip of someone waking someone else up, and then more walking —  which, in its own artistic way, shows the passage of time as a sort of graceful monotony it probably felt like to the real people.  After all, it's hard to squash 4000 miles of walking into a 2 hour movie.  Although I thought some of the jump-cuts were kind of sudden, I thought the filmmaking aided the story.  The jumps-cuts, I felt, were almost artistically necessary to tell the story in a timely manner.  

Also, we hardly see any repeat scenes.  We see two people's funerals, and a third one is summarized by a shot of a trail of footprints leading away from a third person's grave.  Death is never taken lightly in the movie, even though it occurs rather frequently in the gulag.  Valka is the only person who makes light of one person's death, saying, "One less mouth to feed."  His other five companions give him an icy death stare in response. 

Now, before you all run out to rent the movie for history/movie night with the family, this is not a film for young children.  It's rated PG-13 for a reason.  Language and inappropriate content are brief, but they are still there.  But, I still highly advice reading the Plugged In movie review before watching: http://www.pluggedin.com/videos/2011/q2/wayback.aspx

At least two guys get stabbed.  People drop dead during a snowstorm.  A man is shown having frozen to death.  Several people drop from heat stroke in the desert (heat is a foreign thing in Siberia).  Oh, and there's a rather large poisonous snake, for those of you who have snake-phobia (like me).  Aside from people dropping dead, various people being held at gun point, and mentioning of other people getting fingers and heads cut off, and being strangled by barbed wire, the language and inappropriate content are not suitable to children and teenagers. 

My advice: DO NOT watch this movie with children.  In fact, I probably wouldn't watch it until you're an adult.  If you watch it yourselves, have the fast forward button ready until after they escape the gulag.  After that, there's really only two swear words and one crude conversation.  Most of the inappropriate stuff happens in the gulag.

My advice to adults who wish to watch this movie:  If you have a movie filter (such as TV Guardian or Clear Play), I would highly suggest watching this movie with the filter.  If you do not have a filter, be aware of the content issues before viewing, and have the fast forward button ready until after they escape the Gulag.

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

The Host


Happy [late] Birthday Saoirse Ronan!  Just saw your latest movie, The Host, the day after your birthday!  (…not that you'll ever read this...)

Despite my dislike for anything Stephanie Meyers, I did break down and see The Host.

I had my reasons: I like movies about aliens, the concept of the story was interesting, and I was really excited to watch Saoirse Ronan jump off buildings (my inner dare-devil/stunt double got a vicarious experience).  Plus, after the essay I had to write about Saoirse for school, it seemed appropriate to, a) see one of her films, and b) see one of her films as close to her birthday as possible, since I now know when that is.

You know that scary moment when you wake up and realize that you know almost exactly how old some of those actors and actresses are?  Freddie Highmore is an example.  We're roughly three months apart (he's older).  Kinda scary that I would even know that.

Back on topic.

On the surface, The Host doesn't even really seem like something Stephanie Meyers would write.  I mean, where were the vampires?  Where were the werewolves?  Where was the overwhelming confusing love triangle?

This is my theory.  The vampires and werewolves were too busy fighting off the Volturi at the end of the fifth Twilight movie to notice the alien parasites as they first set "foot" on Earth.  By the time Breaking Dawn part 2 ended, it was too late to save humanity or Earth from the invading aliens.  And thus, Bella, Edward, Jacob, and everyone else all you Twilight fans were so fond of, were conquered by little jellyfish looking aliens from another world.  May they rest in peace.

But, that's only my theory.

While people like me may breathe a deep sigh of relief over the welcome absence of vampires and werewolves, the love triangle is still present in The Host.  It is summed up so simply yet appropriately by Wanderer (I think the line is something along the lines of, "These humans are a confusing species."), who expresses her confusion over Jared's reaction to Melanie's slapping him after Jared had kissed Wanderer to "reach" Melanie, who is still trapped in Wanderer's "body" (which is technically Melanie's body that Wanderer "took over").

If you're already lost, it's okay.

As stated earlier, the love triangle is still there, only in a different way.  Allow me to try to explain:

Melanie loves Jared.  Jared loves Melanie.  Wanderer "takes over" Melanie's body, and the two of them go off together to locate Jared.  Jared still loves Melanie, but has a hard time with the concept that Wanderer's in there as well.  Melanie doesn't like it when Wanderer kisses Jared.  Meanwhile, Wanderer and another dude named Ian start having feelings for each other, which bothers Melanie since this is still her body we're talking about.  Wanderer is very confused ("You're angry when I kiss a man you do love, and you get angry when I kiss a man you don't.  It's very confusing.").  Can we blame Wanderer for her confusion?

Saoirse, as I'm noticed in the movies and movie trailers I've seen her in, is very talented when it comes to facial expressions and dramatic scenes.  The whole time you can almost see the wheels turning in her head as she's acting and interacting with the other actors.  It takes serious talent to act like you're being involuntarily controlled by a secondary voice in your head, and even more so to do so while kissing someone.  Saoirse nailed it.

Someone should try putting Saoirse Ronan and Richard Armitage in a movie together.  I think they would go together well, because they're both very good with facial expressions.  Just saying.

Those of you who may have seen The Lovely Bones (Peter Jackson, 2009) may remember Saoirse as 14-year old Susie Salmon (it's okay to say, "Wait!  That was her?").  You may also remember the scene when Susie realizes that she's been murdered (I find it really funny that she has to realize the fact that she's dead), and screams "no!" several times while the background grows almost unbearably bright and she starts to kind of evaporate.  I haven't seen the movie, nor to I suggest seeing it, but I have seen a clip of that one scene.  Susie's screams are heart-rending.  This is a girl who had her whole life ahead of her, who had a date with a handsome classmate on Saturday, and all of that has been stolen from her by a guy who looks like Stanley Tucci with 1970's glasses and a mustache.  You feel Susie's emotions seeping through the screen, threatening to overpower your own emotions as you sit there attempting to eat your popcorn without crying (or passing out from the sight of all that blood).

Like Susie before her, Wanderer has a scream scene, when she accidentally walks into a human clinic and see dead humans and dead aliens lying all over the place.  Can we blame her for freaking out at the sight of all those dead aliens?  And, once again, Saoirse delivers one of those heart-rending "no!" screams that make you want to cry because you almost sorta kinda feel her emotions flooding out toward you from the big screen.  Saoirse nails stuff like that.  I really can't think of another young actress who could have pulled that off.  I say Saoirse is a "young" actress only because she's younger than me (again, kinda scary that I know that).

In closing, I will touch on my last pet peeve: film quality.  In summary, if you go to see The Host expecting it to be as stunning, moving, and/or amazing as Lord of the Rings or Passion of the Christ, you will be disappointed.  But, if you tell yourself you can't believe you just spent $9.75 a ticket to see this movie that is probably going to be a waste of time and money, you will probably be pleasantly surprised.

Ah, where do I begin with quality?

Well, on Friday, I and a classmate were asked about our opinions of the movie.  While I struggled to get a word in inch-wise, I listened as my classmate explained how she thought the storyline was really weak.  I did not find the storyline to be so.  I thought it was cohesive and relatively easy to follow.  Some of the effects are great (the view of Earth from outer space is cool!), and the scenery is vivid even for the New Mexico desert.  However, there were a few things that bothered me.  Just little things, but I tend to be nit-picky.  Some of the sets looked manufactured, which is fine for a building, but I'm talking about the cave-formations in the humans' hide out.  It looked more like plaster than rock at times.  My only other quality pet peeve was Saoirse's eyes.  As Wanderer, she has those really glassy, shiny blue eyes (as do all the aliens in the film).  After the aforementioned scream scene, Wanderer goes running off to be alone (I find it ironic and funny that she dashes off to her prison cell to achieve this solitude).  The scene cuts between her and the outside scenery several times (probably showing the passage of time), but when we return to her, it seems that she no longer has those alien-blue eyes.  Then, in the following scene (a confrontation with Melanie's uncle) she's got the alien-blue eyes again.  Maybe it was just me.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Now that I have thoroughly bashed The Host and made fun of it and it's love triangle, I have a confession.  I still can't believe I'm saying this, but I have to admit that...I actually enjoyed watching The Host.  I tried not to talk about it too much in front of my friend (who saw the movie with me), but I actually did like it a lot more than I let on.  I resisted the urge to talk about it after the movie and on the drive home.

Does this mean that if Open Roads starts selling Wanderer plushies, I would go buy one?  No.  I may have liked it, but I'm not that obsessed.

But, I didn't like it because of the love triangle.  I liked the chase scenes, the intensity of hiding from alien search parties, the scenery, and - of course - the stunts.  The rest of the time it was like, "Oh, there they go kissing...again."

But, I wouldn't mind watching it again.

That's all I've got for The Host.

PS - If asked whether I liked The Host or The Hobbit better, I'm still going with The Hobbit.